Rules and regs of FtP

Nov 16, 2022 | 0 comments

The following are the rules and guidance that the FtP process falls under – this page will grow as we learn more

Why meetings or hearings – am I notified for both? – read here 

Interim order reviews have to occur every 6months until the case is either closed or comes to a full hearing. The NMC are not under any duty to inform you of this review and it will occur automatically by a panel at a meeting. You need to request to attend this as a hearing and present your case so that the interim order can be reviewed proportionately and fairly. This is even more relevant when so many cases are needing to have extensions of IO’s via the high court – challenge politely and ask the NMC to keep making progress. The NMC lawyers have sent us this information to explain:

“Notice and procedure

8. [ (1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (6), following referral by the Council under article 22(5), no interim order may be made, varied, replaced or, in a case where article 31(5)(b) of the Order applies, confirmed by a Practice Committee unless it is satisfied that an interim order notice has been served by the Council.”

The NMC tell us that this means:

“If a registrant is subject to an Interim Suspension Order, the NMC is not required to notify case parties of a scheduled review meeting unless the concerns are in relation to a registrant’s health or the NMC and/or registrant and their representative are applying to change the current order…When an Interim Order is first imposed, the NMC Interim Order decision letter explains the options available to registrant’s and if they want to request a review hearing, we will always accommodate that request. “

Specific rules behind each stage of FtPread here

Up to date version of all of our legislation (including our Order and our Rules) on our website here: Our order and rules – The Nursing and Midwifery Council (nmc.org.uk)

 

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related posts:
High Court extension hearings: a breakdown

This week one of our group attended the High Court to support a fellow healthcare professional. The data This HCW has ongoing process which has continued for many years. They have an interim conditions of practice and as is often the case, due to the case not...

The Fitness to Practice process: a registrant’s reflection

One of our members writes this revealing and candid reflection on their case hearing. It highlights how the current NMC Fitness to Practice process takes little care of registrants during its combative, lawyer-heavy proceedings. Regarding my hearing… Despite it being...

The Fitness to Practice process: a practitioner’s perspective

Having spent years supporting registrants through the Nursing and Midwifery Council’s (NMC) Fitness to Practice process, I’ve seen its impact up close - and I’m here to tell you, the system is broken. written by Simon Holborn - Head of Advocacy at NMCWatch. I see the...

Response to FtP referrals data – Peter Bates of NMCWatch

On Tuesday 19 November, NMCWatch released data on the number of Fitness to Practice (FtP) referrals by NHS employers to the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). In the run-up to this release, we had some healthy internal discussion about what the data represents and...

The number of FtP referrals by NHS Trusts – data release

Today, NMCWatch is releasing a unique set of data on the number of fitness to practice (FtP) referrals by NHS Trusts to the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). This data is the result of multiple Freedom of Information requests made over many months. It is presented...