KEK 2018-2020 – cost of hearing

Based on an FOI and court costs observed in 2018 – these costs were worked out on the rates given below:

   

6 day FtP hearing – case presenter                     £9,408

6 day FtP panel                                                       £8,760

Appeal hearing – 3 days – NMC lawyer.              £4,704

7 day FtP hearing – case presenter                     £10,976

FtP panel                              £10,220.           6 month suspension placed by the SOR committee

1 day appeal. – NMC Lawyer                               £1,568              judge reduced above to 4months suspension

1 day SOR hearing – case presenter                  £1,564

– SOR panel                          £9,084

Total cost                                                             £56,284

This midwife continued to attempt to secure her PIN back from the NMC despite the order lapsing following the final (second appeal).

To date, she has still not returned to practice.

Both high court judges in the separate appeals made strong observations in regard to both the original trust investigation and the NMC process. The NMC gave little communication or wider feedback in regard to the judge’s comments. In fact, off the record, the case presenter was heard to state that they didn’t necessarily agree with the observations of the esteemed judges.

High court judges are extremely skilled in reviewing such cases but have little power to fully overturn the process or step in if they feel the process itself is detrimental. Nurses and midwives have to show deep remediation and, if denying charges, as in this case, will always risk a worse outcome.

Despite the two successful outcomes at appeal for this case, and the observations mirroring previous cases heard through the high court, we still see nurses and midwives experiencing the same issues with the process that this midwife suffered. Sadly, all of them have chosen not to pursue through the courts and have stepped away from the profession.

If you feel there must be a better way – please sign our petition.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related posts:
Weaponisation of FtP – NS article summary

This is a summary of today's Nursing Standard article created for the benefit of those without paywall access to the NS site. Managers using FtP as a weapon: nurses punished for speaking out Nurse whistleblowers are raising serious concerns about the misuse of the...

High Court extension hearings: a breakdown

This week one of our group attended the High Court to support a fellow healthcare professional. The data This HCW has ongoing process which has continued for many years. They have an interim conditions of practice and as is often the case, due to the case not...

The Fitness to Practice process: a registrant’s reflection

One of our members writes this revealing and candid reflection on their case hearing. It highlights how the current NMC Fitness to Practice process takes little care of registrants during its combative, lawyer-heavy proceedings. Regarding my hearing… Despite it being...

The Fitness to Practice process: a practitioner’s perspective

Having spent years supporting registrants through the Nursing and Midwifery Council’s (NMC) Fitness to Practice process, I’ve seen its impact up close - and I’m here to tell you, the system is broken. written by Simon Holborn - Head of Advocacy at NMCWatch. I see the...

Response to FtP referrals data – Peter Bates of NMCWatch

On Tuesday 19 November, NMCWatch released data on the number of Fitness to Practice (FtP) referrals by NHS employers to the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). In the run-up to this release, we had some healthy internal discussion about what the data represents and...