KEK 2018-2020 – cost of hearing

Based on an FOI and court costs observed in 2018 – these costs were worked out on the rates given below:

   

6 day FtP hearing – case presenter                     £9,408

6 day FtP panel                                                       £8,760

Appeal hearing – 3 days – NMC lawyer.              £4,704

7 day FtP hearing – case presenter                     £10,976

FtP panel                              £10,220.           6 month suspension placed by the SOR committee

1 day appeal. – NMC Lawyer                               £1,568              judge reduced above to 4months suspension

1 day SOR hearing – case presenter                  £1,564

– SOR panel                          £9,084

Total cost                                                             £56,284

This midwife continued to attempt to secure her PIN back from the NMC despite the order lapsing following the final (second appeal).

To date, she has still not returned to practice.

Both high court judges in the separate appeals made strong observations in regard to both the original trust investigation and the NMC process. The NMC gave little communication or wider feedback in regard to the judge’s comments. In fact, off the record, the case presenter was heard to state that they didn’t necessarily agree with the observations of the esteemed judges.

High court judges are extremely skilled in reviewing such cases but have little power to fully overturn the process or step in if they feel the process itself is detrimental. Nurses and midwives have to show deep remediation and, if denying charges, as in this case, will always risk a worse outcome.

Despite the two successful outcomes at appeal for this case, and the observations mirroring previous cases heard through the high court, we still see nurses and midwives experiencing the same issues with the process that this midwife suffered. Sadly, all of them have chosen not to pursue through the courts and have stepped away from the profession.

If you feel there must be a better way – please sign our petition.

Related posts:

Continuous Interim Order extensions: what can be done?

For a long time now it has become almost routine that the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) will apply for extensions to interim orders due to cases not being concluded during the 18 months they are in place for. Whilst the NMC recognises the need to cut down on the...

Why does the NMC keep ignoring Appeals judges?

Since 2009 we know of more than 50 cases where a High Court Judge has ruled that the decision by an NMC Fitness to Practice panel or application for interim order extension is wrong. Seven of these cases were in 2025 and among an increasing number being supported by...

Another NMC ‘dishonesty’ charge fail

Nurrish v Nursing and Midwifery Council: When Process Fails, Outcomes Cannot Be Trusted. The High Court judgment in Nurrish v Nursing and Midwifery Council is the latest in a long line of appellate decisions exposing serious flaws in the way fitness to practise (FtP)...

NMCWatch statement for National Safeguarding Adults Week 2025

Protecting patients means protecting those who speak up. This Safeguarding Week, NMCWatch highlights a critical gap in the UK’s health and regulatory system: the absence of meaningful protection for professionals who raise concerns in the public interest. Our support...

Ishbel Straker fights back

Today Ishbel Straker begins a campaign about the issues she has experienced when referred to the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). She has told LBC she has been subjected to “vindictive, calculated and malicious” behaviour by the NMC after whistleblowing on a...